Low code development platform
ObjectGears Low code platform for fast, effective and efficient application development.
Overview
Plan, develop, test, deploy, extend, and maintain enterprise apps…
IT processes
Supporting a full range of processes…
Avoid vendor lock-in
Detect vendor lock-in…
Enterprise Application Development
Solve complex business challenges by building low-code apps with speed and flexibility…
Workflow
Automate processes, Trigger and respond to events, Synchronize activities…
Develop apps with no limits...
Integrations
Integrate your solutions with other data that you get through ready-made connectors…
ObjectGears properties
Take a look at other ObjectGears properties…
Examples of a fast development
One of elementary ObjectGears ideas is to enable a fast application development without programming skills…
Custom development
Custom development - Rapid Application Development (RAD, Low-code, No-code)…
Solutions
Take advantage of the solutions provided by ObjectGears. We are constantly expanding and supplementing the solutions.
Service catalogue
IT organizations usually grow, develop, become more complex over the years. Together with this development overview about provided services often declines. Since a good quality service is a target of all IT processes, ITIL recommends clarifying portfolio of provided services and maintaining their catalogue.
IT Configuration Database (CMDB)
Keep an overview of your applications, infrastructure and the context you need.
Version Controlled Documentation
Document your products, processes and architecture.
Configuration management
The objective of Configuration management process is to identify, record and control configuration items including their versions, properties and relations and to ensure integrity of configuration items during their whole life cycle in order that only authorized items are used and only authorized changes of items are performed.
Request fulfilment - Service Desk
The objective of the Request fulfillment process is to provide users with a channel for requesting standard services, for which a defined approval process is defined (catalogue requests), to provide users and customers with information about service availability and process of their acquiring, to ensure and deliver components of standard services (e.g. licenses) and to help with general questions, complaints and comments.
Incident and Problem management
Incident management focuses on restoration of services, that were interrupted or deteriorated in an unplanned way, as quickly as possible with the objective to minimize impact on business. Problem management focuses on analysis of the root cause of the incidents with the objective to eliminate future incidents.
Change management
The purpose of Change management process is standardization procedures for effective and fast execution of necessary changes, recording of all changes in the Configuration management systém and optimalization of risk related to changes.
Test management
Testing process is performed according to ITIL v3 in step Coordinate implementation of the Change management process. There is process of Release management following further in this step. Same like other processes also testing needs to be tailored to the company size, its values and risk appetite.
Release management
The objective of Release management process is to define and agree with customer and all the stakeholders production deployment plan, ensure that each release contains all the necessary components that are compatible and secure user training and transfer of knowledge to teams that will support the new services.
Knowledge management
The objective of the Knowledge management process is to ensure that the right information is provided to the right person at the right time in order an informed decision can be done.
Project management
Larger organizations need to take care of process of achieving enterprise and business objectives by means of managing programmes and portfolios. ObjectGears supports these processes in model IT, when coming out from Business goals, that should be reflected in Ideas of new Projects.
Program and Portfolio management
Larger organizations with many projects need to control besides particular projects also their groups (programmes), that aim to realize longterm organization objectives, and portfolios, containing programmes and projects, that are prioritized according to the organization targets.
Financial management
Financial management process provides a financial view on the value of IT services and corresponding configuration items.
Solver task prioritization
ObjectGears users working in particular processes have a single task queue at disposal, that sets current priorities to each of them no matter he/she is working on catalogue requests and user calls, incidents and problems, tasks or he/she participates on testing or defect removal.
Master Data Management
Master Data Management (MDM) represents a methodology for managing critical business data including so called single point of truth. Master data are shared between particular applications and business processes. Typical examples of master data are data about products, customers and vendors. Appropriate master data management brings benefits in data quality, elimination of duplicities, compliance with legal requirements, elimination of inefficiency and increase of quality of services, reporting and decisions.
Easy Task
EasyTasks demonstrates basic ObjectGears functionalities and possibilities of a fast effective application development on this platform. The model is suitable for a simple task follow up in small teams.
Cost allocation
Cost allocation is part of the management accounting, having the goal to determine which cost relate to certain objects. These can be products, services, external customers, internal teams, projects, sales territories…
Microsoft Graph - Office 365
Get information about Office 365 licenses, those available and those allocated to users, and other data from Microsoft API Graph.
Customers and partners
See partnership options, operating model, license terms, free license options and how to avoid vendor lock.
Contact
Blog
Read articles on various topics related to ObjectGears and Low code development…
FAQ
Check frequently asked questions.
Cloud service or on premise license
Use ObjectGears as a service with a monthly fee or you can operate it in your own environment with license or for free.
Free license
Get a free license up to 25 users with a full functionality.
Become partners
Provide ObjectGears to your customers and collaborate with us.
How to detect and avoid vendor lock-in
Don`t be dependent on particular vendor…
Resources
Documentation, blog articles, videos and other support…
Documentation
Check out the ObjectGears documentation, solutions, and case studies…
Download installer
Installer helps you install and upgrade ObjectGears.
Videos
Watch the videos for a quick introduction to ObjectGears.
Terms and Conditions
Take a look at ObjectGears terms and conditions of use.
What do I have at the beginning...
Only high level overview about my teams, their operational duties and engagements in projects.
I always have to ask more detailed information from my subordinates.
I lack an overview of what my people are working on just now, what they worked in the past and how much effort did it take and what projects they are planned in future in order to ensure required activities (both operational and project ones).
In certain cases I need to see the course of solving particular task, in order I could react to incomplete or untrue information and justify job that my people did or, the other way around, immediately identify, when somebody made a mistake.
What am I going to have at the end…
I know how many incidents were solved after the target time.
I know what priorities do my people have.
I have an overview of all the projects, requirements that they solve, what tasks associated with them were issued, what is the status of these tasks, what is the status of testing, what was the course of particular task, how much time did a solver spend on the task, what are the overall capacities spent on particular projects, what was the original plan.
Particular documents about preferred technologies and ways how to integrate them.
I have to get more detailed information about particular systems repeatedly.
What is the share of technologies we use
How do systems communicate each to another (interfaces)
When does support of particular systems end (End of Life)
I am recording tasks and cooperation agreed on with employees in Excel. I have confirmation about task assignment and its outputs in my emails.
I lack breakdown of projects in particular phases, change requests, testing and ability to get fast from the project level to particular tasks and status of their solving.
We need to better plan resources and see their following use in a project.
Projects are structured into logical units, I can issue tasks and easily see their fulfilment. All this in a single environment ensuring automatic notifications at the time of creating the task or handing over to another solver, at the time of approaching or exceeding target time (escallation).
I have a good overview about testing, test scenarios that were performed, bugs that were reported and status of these bugs solving. I can see wheather or not my project is colliding with another projects from the perspective of planned changes or planned resources.
I can plan resources on the project, solve collisions (resource overallocation) with other project colleagues and have an overview about resource utilization (time spent by solvers on tasks that I have issued).
I am bothered that we keep information about systems and applications in an isolated way in many documents. I miss a consolidated view and determination who is responsible for what.
I miss keeping records about changes, that would help when identifying subsequent problems and proving what was actually changed.
I miss e.g. overview of certificate validity, maintenance or support contracts and timely reminder that they need to be renewed.
A single central system for covering all the aspects of information systems (from the datacenter, over hardware, applications to processes, system operation and system change management). We can agree extent of detail in keeping the information in our team in order it corresponds with our organization needs.
When it comes to an operational incident or I should assess impact of a planned change, I have overviews of previous incidents, performed changes, dependencies on other configurations items, relevant knowledge base articles etc. at disposal for all configuration items.
Elementary operational tasks like certificate, hardware service contract or software maintenance renewal are centrally registered and I am receiving notifications from the system about need to solve their renewal.
I receive tasks verbally or by email. I can hard orientate myself in the history associated with solution and changes in the task or priorities.
Customers and managers retroactively claim that we had another agreement at the beginning. I have problems to support the facts because it means going through emails if they exist at all.
There are no rules for the necessary completion date (guaranteed times for standard tasks and agreed terms for more sophisticated tasks).
I have tasks in a single central system no matter if it is operational incident, catalogue request, testing, client complaint etc. Changes are provable – we do not spend time any more on discussions who and when delivered, said or added what.
The planned date of task completion is driven by clear rules.
I have a number of ideas for improvement of current applications or creation of new ones that would replace Excel files, but my ideas are not realized due to the volume of another changes.
I would like to participate more in the change process of applications I work with.
I would like to influence more how our applications support our processes and business opportunities.
I can design my application in a user interface that I can understand including screens, data referencing and process logic (workflow).
My colleagues can test my proposal and confirm my vision or bring new initiatives for improvement.
After approval within our team I can hand over my solution to IT maintenance in order to ensure separation of access to data (work in the application - business) and data administration (back up, access management – IT).
I miss an overview about planned application outages.
I miss an overview about incidents in applications critical for my department.
I miss an overview of changes planned in applications that are critical for my department and engagement of my employees in projects (particular tasks and time that they spent on them).
I can see planned application outages in my dashboard.
I can see an overview of incidents that violated functioning of applications that are important for me. I can see how fast were they solved and if SLA was kept. I have summary overviews/charts and history of particular incidents at disposal.
I have overview of changes in my applications at disposal - those planned/prepared, those ongoing and also those already finished. I can see what my people work on and how much time it cost.
Processes are described but we miss clear link to applications that support them.
I need to know which processes are supported by particular application.
I need a system that will support performing Business Impact Analysis in the company.
Linking application repository with processes repository enables to find out which applications are supported by which processes and compare application availability with required process availability.
I have an up to date overview of applications with inadequate RTO from the perspective of processes that they support.
I have a tool for a regular assessment of process criticality (BIA questionnaire).
I am often managing my data in Excel or Word documents. The fact the information is not in a central system is often a blocking issue when it comes to day to day operations.
I have to do a lot of things manually even if they could be automated. My initiatives for improvement are difficult to be carried through.
We often have to write again the data to another systems.
A single central system with a transparent menu available according to the access rights. All the changes are logged.
Routine processes are automated. I can materialize my ideas in a test environment and let them transfer into production system.
Data transfers are automated and save my time.
I am working on descreasing fluctuation and keeping key employees.
I help managers to motivate people to high performance.
I want to create such an environment where employess come themselves with initiatives and ideas and enjoy putting helpful projects into practise.
ObjectGears brings clarity into processes and activities associated with information systems. People appreciate when their job is well organized.
Employees can design their system environment themselves and replace unstructured data in Excel or Word.
I get information about systems by means of interviewing application administrators.
Users store number of data in Excel or other systems that do not held information about data originator (audit trail) and manage access on data.
Two types of benefits:
Information about systems.
Application administrators maintain data about systems in a single central environment.
I have summary overviews from the whole information system about used technologies, system end of life, ensuring administrator back up, support from vendor, RTO, DRP and all that in relation to significance of the application (Business Impact Analysis).
Business has its critical data, that were up to now in applications like Excel, in a central database accessible via web interface with managed data and audit trail.
This website is using cookies
This website is using Cookies files to provide its services. By using this website you agree with using Cookies files.